HARARE — Political strategist and activist Sipho Malunga is reported to have mobilized $2 million to fund efforts opposing ZANU-PF’s 2030 Vision agenda, signaling a ramp-up in political activity as the country edges closer to critical policy and electoral milestones. Sources familiar with the funding efforts say that the announcement of the $2 million pot has triggered a flurry of activity …
Sipho Malunga Mobilises $2 Million for Anti-2030 Campaign; Political Battle Lines Sharpen

HARARE — Political strategist and activist Sipho Malunga is reported to have mobilized $2 million to fund efforts opposing ZANU-PF’s 2030 Vision agenda, signaling a ramp-up in political activity as the country edges closer to critical policy and electoral milestones.
Sources familiar with the funding efforts say that the announcement of the $2 million pot has triggered a flurry of activity among political actors, activists, and civil society operatives eager to secure a stake in the campaign. Analysts note that the dynamics resemble a competitive scramble, with various actors positioning themselves to benefit both financially and politically from the anti-2030 initiative.
“There’s now a clear incentive for different groups to mobilize and be visible,” said one political commentator. “The money has effectively sharpened the fight, as everyone wants a slice of the pie.”
Observers note that a diverse mix of individuals is reportedly involved, including briefcase human rights operators, opportunistic political figures, and formerly influential politicians who have struggled to maintain relevance in Zimbabwe’s evolving political landscape. These actors are said to be drawing inspiration from past campaigns such as Madhuku’s National Constitutional Assembly (NCA), which successfully resisted the implementation of the Chidyausiku Commission in the mid-2000s.
Analysts caution, however, that while the funding and mobilization efforts could invigorate opposition efforts, the proliferation of participants seeking personal gain may also lead to fragmentation and competing agendas, potentially undermining the broader campaign.
“The anti-2030 campaign has a serious political purpose,” said one civic analyst. “But there is a real risk that personal ambition and financial incentives could overshadow collective objectives.”
The $2 million fund is reportedly earmarked for public campaigns, advocacy, media engagement, and grassroots mobilization, all aimed at building pressure against the ruling party’s long-term development agenda and associated political consolidation strategies.
Political watchers say the coming months are likely to see heightened public messaging, coalition-building, and strategic lobbying, with Sipho Malunga at the center of efforts to coordinate disparate actors while ensuring that the campaign maintains focus on its anti-2030 objectives.
“This is shaping up to be one of the most organized and well-funded opposition efforts in recent memory,” said one political observer. “It will test both the unity of the participants and the ruling party’s capacity to respond effectively.”
With funding now in place and political actors scrambling to position themselves, Zimbabwe is set for a period of intense political activity, as the battle over the 2030 Vision agenda moves from strategy discussions to public campaigns and high-profile interventions.





